Atheist Ireland, the Evangelical Alliance of Ireland, and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Ireland, have published our joint submission to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. The Committee will soon be questioning Ireland about its human rights record under this treaty.

This case is relevant to nonreligious parents in the Republic of Ireland. Under the Good Friday Agreement, the Irish State has agreed to strengthen the protection of human rights in the Republic to at least an equivalent level of protection of human rights as will pertain in Northern Ireland.

Our three groups have told the UN that we want the Irish  State to establish secular schools, and to ensure that every child has the right to access a local publicly funded school, without religious discrimination or being threatened with refusal of access if they don’t uphold the school’s ethos.

Once the Dail returns, Atheist Ireland will also continue to lobby on our case that the Department of Education is misusing public funds by giving money to schools that do not respect the constitutional funding condition of ensuring that children can choose to not attend religious instruction classes.

You can help us to continue this and other secular work by joining Atheist Ireland as a member, or by asking anybody who you think may be interested in joining us to do so. We are an entirely voluntary body with no paid staff, and we depend on our members to continue our work. You can join Atheist Ireland here.

The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child will be questioning Ireland next year. Atheist Ireland, the Evangelical Alliance of Ireland, and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Ireland, have made this joint submission to the UN on freedom of religion and belief in Irish schools.
Our Recommendations
The State should commit to ensuring that every child has the right to access a local publicly funded school without religious discrimination or being threatened with refusal of access if they don’t uphold the schools ethos.
The State should ensure that schools and patron bodies comply with Section 62(7)(n) of the Education (Admissions to schools) Act 2018 by actually writing the details of the arrangements into their admission policies, and not by saying parents have to meet with the school principal.
The State should commit to establishing secular or non-denominational schools at primary and second level, and not merely multi-denominational schools.
The State should legally and clearly define the terms denominational, multi-denominational, interdenominational, and non-denominational, as per the Irish Human Rights & Equality Commission Report ‘Religion & Education; A human Rights Perspective’.
The State should provide statutory guidelines to ensure that publicly funded schools:

• Respect and vindicate the positive rights of minorities to freedom of conscience and respect for their religious or nonreligious philosophical convictions.
• Respect and vindicate the right of children who exercise their constitutional right to not attend religious instruction, and provide such children with supervision or an alternative curriculum subject.

The State should provide a neutral studying environment, outside the confines of religious instruction classes that students can choose to not attend.
Contents of our joint submission
Part 1 — Overview
1.1 Who we are
1.2 Our recommendations
Part 2 — C. Civil rights and freedoms (arts. 7, 8 and 13–17)
2.1 From the List of Issues
2.2 Response of the State party
2.3 Our comments on the State Response
2.4 The right to not attend religious instruction in schools
2.5 Types of Religion and ethical classes in schools
2.6 What happens to students who do manage to not participate in religion classes
2.7 Religious ethos and academic subjects
2.8 The Framework for the Primary School Curriculum
2.9 What does all of this mean?
2.10 UN Human Rights Committee
Part 3 — G. Basic health and welfare (arts. 6, 18 (3), 24, 26, 27 (1)–(3) and 33)
3.1 From the List of Issues
3.2 Response of State Party
3.3 Our comments on the State Response
Part 4 — H. Education, leisure and cultural activities (arts. 28–31)
4.1 From the List of Issues
4.2 Response of State Party
4.3 Our comments on the State Response to paragraph 27(b)
4.4 Our comments on the State Response to paragraph 27(c)
Part 1 — Overview
Who we are
Atheist Ireland, the Evangelical Alliance of Ireland, and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Ireland work together in a campaign for secularism and human rights. Despite our different world views, we agree that each person should be treated with respect, our right to hold our beliefs should be treated with respect, and States should treat us all equally before the law by remaining neutral between religious and nonreligious philosophical convictions.
As part of our work:

• We promote the fundamental human rights of freedom of conscience, religion and belief, equality before the law, and freedom from discrimination for all citizens.
• We promote these human rights within Irish society and political institutions, and at the United Nations and other international human rights regulatory bodies.

In support of these aims, we are making this Submission to outline the failure of Ireland to protect and respect the human rights of Atheists and secularists, Ahmadiyya Muslim and Evangelical Christians, and all minorities in the Irish education system. Our children are discriminated against on the grounds of religion and their rights under the Convention are not protected.
As you would expect, our groups can have different policies beyond the scope of this submission. For example, Atheist Ireland believes that state-funded schools with a religious ethos should provide arrangements for children whose parents do not want them to attend religious instruction, while the Evangelical Alliance of Ireland believes that religious schools should not have to make such arrangements if parents have the choice of an alternative school in their area that has a secular ethos.
However, this submission focuses on the areas on which our groups agree, regarding the rights of children, in accordance with the provisions of the Convention and the situation on the ground in Ireland. In practice, there are no secular schools in Ireland, so the question of alternatives to religious schools does not arise. What we are collectively trying to achieve in Ireland is that every child has the right to access a local publicly funded school without religious discrimination or being threatened with refusal of access if they don’t uphold the schools ethos. Read more…

Court case supports rights of parents and students in schools in the Republic

The Northern Ireland High Court has found that schools breached the human rights of nonreligious parents. The state Religious Education course and the Collective Worship in schools breached the parents’ right to respect for their convictions and also their right to freedom of conscience, religion and belief.
The case was an application for judicial review by a child, JR87, and her father, G, in respect of the teaching arrangements for Religious Education and Collective worship in controlled primary schools in Northern Ireland.
This case is relevant to nonreligious parents in the Republic of Ireland. Under the Good Friday Agreement, the Irish State has agreed to strengthen the protection of human rights and strengthen and underpin the constitutional protection of human rights in the Republic. The measures brought forward must ensure at least an equivalent level of protection of human rights as will pertain in Northern Ireland.
In essence nonreligious parents in the Republic should have the same rights as nonreligious parents in Northern Ireland.
The Northern Ireland High Court recognised or found that:

• Secularism and atheism are philosophical convictions protected by Article 9 of the European Convention.
• The Religious Education course in Northern Ireland schools was not objective, critical and pluralistic and did not respect non religious parents’ convictions.
• The concerns raised by the parents in relation to their child being excluded were valid.
• There was a right to be excluded from the Religion course, but this was not a sufficient answer to the lack of pluralism that the court identified.
• There was a danger that parents will be deterred from seeking exclusion for a children and that it also funds the risk of stigmatisation of their children.

This is what Irish parents have to put up with in publicly funded schools in the Republic. The religion courses in schools are not objective, critical and pluralistic. Even the State Religious Education course at second level is not objective. We do not want to opt our children out we want to opt them in to an education that is objective, critical and pluralistic and protects the Constitutional and Human rights of all.
The parents in the Northern Ireland case stated the following to the Court:

“24. I appreciate that we could have sought to exclude (JR87) from collective worship and religious education/activities in school. I believe that (JR87) should not have to be excluded from any aspect of her education/school life, simply because the law mandates exclusive Christian worship and RE in her school. In my view, that legal settlement is wrong and is contrary to my rights and (JR87’s) rights under the European Convention. Religion should be taught to children in a way that is objective, critical and pluralistic. Children should be able to consider and explore the teaching and practices of a wide variety of religious and nonreligious traditions and philosophies.
I believe that (JR87) should be taught and have experience of as many different religions and philosophies as possible during her primary education. Exclusion is not the answer and does not respect my belief (shared by my wife) that religious education and experiences should be provided to our daughter in a way that is objective, critical and pluralistic and which should include teaching/experience of nonreligious world views as well. The current system purports to “respect” those beliefs by saying that our child can be excluded from an aspect of her education. Having to consider even exclusion is just a particularly clear manifestation of the problem with the current legal settlement.
25. Furthermore, as noted above, if (JR87) were to be excluded then she would be the only child in the school to be so excluded. This would undoubtedly have the effect of singling (JR87) out from her peers. I would be concerned that (JR87) might be bullied or isolated as a result. There is also a risk that (JR87) herself might be confused or upset about this and may feel that she was being punished by such an exclusion. In addition, in a small school community such an exclusion will also be unlikely to go unnoticed by school staff and other parents, via their children.
Thus, exclusion would likely have the result of repeatedly ‘outing’ our family (school year by school year) as a nonChristian family to the wider school community. Again, this is not something that we would wish or feel comfortable with.
Exclusion is characterised by the school and Department, as, in essence a voluntary choice open to parents as of right. There would be nothing voluntary about it in our case. I do not accept that if (JR87) were to be excluded that this would represent a truly voluntary parental choice. I say that because (JR87) would only be excluded because the religious education and experiences provided by the school do not comply with her human rights under the European Convention.”

Since the Good Friday Agreement, various governments in the Republic have failed to put in place comparable steps to protect Constitutional and Human Rights of non religious parents in the education system. This is despite the fact that the Courts in the Republic have found that Irish parents have more rights under the Irish Constitution than they do under human rights law.
The Court in Northern Ireland found that:

The court considers that the concerns raised by the parents in relation to exclusion are valid. Whilst an unfettered right to exclusion is available it is not a sufficient answer to the lack of pluralism identified by the court. It runs the risk of placing undue burdens on parents. There is a danger that parents will be deterred from seeking exclusion for a child. Importantly, it also runs the risk of stigmatisation of their children. As Warby J said “the need to withdraw a child would be a manifestation of the lack of pluralism in question.”
[123] The court therefore concludes that the impugned legislation is in breach of both applicants’ rights under Article 2 of the First Protocol ECHR read with Article 9 ECHR. I say both applicants because whilst the case has been considered primarily through the prism of the rights of the parents, it seems to the court that it is arguable when the first sentence of A2P1 is read with Article 9, JR87’s right to education must be in a form which respects her rights to believe or not to believe.”

This Northern Ireland case vindicates what Atheist Ireland has been saying for years. Our education system breaches the rights of minority parents and we simply do not accept the contention that schools are inclusive and promote pluralism. Instead, they undermine it. Read more…
Image above from Wikipedia under Creative Commons Licence.

Atheist Ireland’s ‘notme.ie‘ is a place where people can publicly renounce the religion of their childhood. Currently there are 1940 symbolic defections. Many share their reasons for making a public symbolic defection which you can read here. 

Tell us what you think

Have you any feedback that you would like to give us on the Secular Sunday newsletter. What are we getting right? What could we improve on? Is there something you would like to see included? Drop us an email at secularsunday@atheist.ie.

Atheist Ireland is an entirely volunteer run organisation. We receive no grants or government funding to continue our campaign work. We rely entirely on membership fess and donations.

Annual membership is nominal; €25 waged, €10 unwaged/student and €40 for family membership. Please consider becoming a member. Membership means:

National

Clonliffe has gone and the Irish Catholic Church may not be far behind it

By Gerard Howlin

Ireland

• Irish Catholics call for radical change in Church in report sent to Rome Document shows desire for change in attitude to LGBTI+ people and removal of mandatory rule for priests
• Need for change in Catholic Church evident to ‘anyone with two eyes in their head’, says Archbishop -Catholic Church in Ireland has sent synthesis of 26 diocesan reports seeking reforms to Rome

International

• Boy Scouts Revises Bankruptcy Plan to Remove $250 Million Mormon Church Settlement 
• US pastor calls congregation ‘cheap’ for not buying him a luxury watch
• Quebec Cardinal Marc Ouellet accused of sexual assault in class-action lawsuit against archdiocese
• Texas schools drop Bible and Anne Frank
• Louisiana Woman Denied Abortion Despite Unborn Babys Fatal Skull Condition
• Poulner Infant School refused permission by Hampshire County Council to stop collective worship
• Polish father fights against a new textbook that demeans his daughter conceived by IVF
• It’s Almost Impossible To Get An Abortion In Poland. These Women Crossed The Border To Germany For Help
• Blasphemy: Court Dismisses Kano Singer’s Appeal, Upholds Retrial
• Nigerias sharia blasphemy law not unconstitutional, court rules 
• Report: Nonreligious LGBTQ people face heightened stigma, conceal their beliefs
• Young, Christian and gaining momentum: meet Britain’s anti-abortionists