What Does The Bible Say About Abortion?

On 5th March 2017, Ashling O’Brien addressed the Citizen’s Assembly on the question of abortion. The paper on which Ashling’s presentation was based, makes it clear that the 8th Amendment to the Irish Constitution was religiously inspired. It is interesting to wonder though, by which revelation was it made known to the Roman Catholic Church that heaven does not approve of abortion? Is there a divinely inspired scripture, through which the word of god explained to humanity that life begins at conception? Starting at the start, the Book of Genesis seems to suggest that life begins with the first breath:

 

“… then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being.”

 

However, there is another passage of the Bible that deals more explicitly with abortion. In the Catholic Bible, the Old Testament includes both the Law and the Prophets. The first five books constitute the Law (containing many proscriptions described by Moses) and then this is followed by the Prophets (containing many more books from Joshua onwards). The fourth book of the Law is Numbers, and it contains the Test for an Unfaithful Wife:

 

Numbers 5-11-22 (New Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition)

Numbers 5-11-22 (New Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition)

 

These verses appear to describe explicit divine support for abortion. In fact, the context in which it seems that Yahweh approves of abortion, is when a husband wishes to force his wife to terminate a pregnancy (even against her will) if he suspects he may not be the biological father. It’s often said that such Old Testament proscriptions are superseded by the New Testament, but of course Jesus also said:

 

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.”

 

Various Christian theologians of several different denominations, have argued that this passage from the Book of Numbers still does not suggest that it is permissible for a woman to procure an abortion. Rather, it has been argued that since the passage describes a “Trial By Ordeal”, it is god and not the woman who terminates the pregnancy, and god will only do this if the woman has been unfaithful.

Dr Robert M Price is a Biblical scholar and theologian, who holds two PhDs that relate to scriptural studies, and he has summarised such apologetics as follows on his podcast, The Bible Geek:

 

“In more liberal critical commentaries, whether Catholic or Protestant, they try to ameliorate the offence of this by saying that though this law is based on an archaic ‘Trial By Ordeal’, it has been taken by the Priestly author and made into a more spiritual version. This is because, as one commentator puts it, the punishment comes from Yahweh. To me, that makes it even worse. It’s no longer superstition. It’s a vengeful deity visiting punishment on the innocent.”

 

That is, it does not seem to improve the Bible by arguing that scripture prohibits women from procuring an abortion, only because it is Yahweh who should carry out abortions when a husband wishes to force one on his innocent wife. You can hear more of Dr Price’s views about this passage on Episode 17-049 of his podcast (the impersonation is explained by the fact that Billy Graham was Dr Price’s commencement speaker).

In conclusion, neither the idea that life begins at conception nor the idea that god opposes abortion, are well-supported by scripture. In fact, if supposedly divine and inerrant scripture is taken seriously, precisely the opposite is true. It is hardly surprising then that several Christian denominations and many Christian leaders, take a different view from the Roman Catholic Church on this topic. For example, the Church of Ireland Bishop of Cashel, Michael Burrows, has already announced that he will be voting to Repeal the 8th Amendment.

John Hamill

3 Comments

  1. Avatar
    JustSomeone April 17, 2018

    Also, Exodus 21:22-25 assigns a lower value to an unborn baby than to those born – “And if men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no [further] injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him; and he shall pay as the judges decide. But if there is any [further] injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.”

    • Avatar
      sam July 07, 2018

      exodus 21 is clarifying that the woman and potential baby are the property of a man, and if either are harmed the man should be compensated for damage to his property. The original verse says if the baby is born early, alive but with no further problems, then a fine will do.
      If the baby dies then the attacker should be put to death. If some deformity ensues, then the same deformity is given to the offender. This passage does not value born over unborn, only male entitlement to keep other beings as their private property. It devalues the woman completely.

  2. Avatar
    sam July 07, 2018

    exodus 21 is proclaiming that the woman and potential baby are the property of a man, and if either are harmed the man should be compensated for damage to his property. The original verse says if the baby is born early, alive but with no further problems, then a fine will do.
    If the baby dies then the attacker should be put to death. If some deformity ensues, then the same deformity is given to the offender. This passage does not value born over unborn, only male entitlement to keep other beings as their private property. It devalues the woman completely.

Atheist Ireland