Catholic Church at UN rejects human right to freedom from religion
Last Friday, 2nd March, at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, the Holy See opposed the fundamental human right to freedom from religion, claiming that it is a patronising idea that goes beyond the mandate of UN’s special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief.
The Holy See also argued that secularist ideologies, that promote ideas that are not in line with religious wisdom and the sentiments of the greatest part of humanity, will weaken the UN and lead to a state of irrelevance of the multilateral human rights system.
These are the people who run 90% of Irish primary schools and more than half of Irish second level schools. They have also, until the recent directive from the Department of Education, infiltrated the teaching of religion in State-run ETB second level schools.
The Catholic Church repeatedly makes it clear, for those of us who listen to them, that they do not accept the right to freedom from religion. That is why they permeate school days with Catholic faith formation, and make it difficult or impossible to opt out of religion classes.
The right to opt out of religion, in all Irish schools, is not new. It is a constitutional right. But it has not been given practical effect, because the State has given control of most of our schools to an organisation that does not respect the constitutional and human right to freedom from religion.
The Right to Freedom From Religion
The Holy See is simply wrong when it claims that UN Human Rights treaties do not protect the right to freedom from religion. The UN Human Rights Committee General Comment No. 22, on Article 18 (Freedom of Thought, Conscience or Religion) clearly states:
“2. Article 18 protects theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief. The terms “belief” and “religion” are to be broadly construed. Article 18 is not limited in its application to traditional religions or to religions and beliefs with institutional characteristics or practices analogous to those of traditional religions.
5. The Committee observes that the freedom to “have or to adopt” a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one’s current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views, as well as the right to retain one’s religion or belief.
6. The Committee notes that public education that includes instruction in a particular religion or belief is inconsistent with article18.4 unless provision is made for non-discriminatory exemptions or alternatives that would accommodate the wishes of parents and guardians.”
The Irish State has a duty to protect the human rights of all students in all State-funded schools, even if the State chooses to allow other bodies such as the Catholic Church to run those schools. The Department of Education should insist that all school patron bodies fully respect the right to freedom from religion in all State-funded schools.
The Holy See Speech at the UN
Here is the full speech by the Holy See’s Ivan Jurkovic:
“Many societies around the world adopt an attitude of rejection to religious freedom, marginalising and at times openly persecuting religious minorities, whether they are a traditional part of the social landscape or just recently established.
Laws and policies that discriminate against religious minorities are still all too present in our world. Some states forfeit their responsibility to protect their citizens belonging to religious minorities, inter alia by hindering access to justice or not ensuring fair trials in case of mob violence.
On the other hand, those states that permit and cultivate secularist ideologies, where subtle and sophisticated forms of prejudice and hostility towards believers and religious symbols are occurring.
Unfortunately, these reductive attitudes are at times perceived in some quarters of international organisations, when controversial notions that are not in line with international instruments, religious wisdom, and the sentiments of the greatest part of humanity are promoted, or even imposed.
Such a policy cannot but weaken this institution, leading to a state of irrelevance of the multilateral human rights system, which is already frequently criticised.
Of the utmost concern, the use of the term freedom from religion, which is not contemplated in the international instruments, reveals a patronising idea of religion, going beyond the mandate of the special rapporteur.
Once again, the Holy See reiterates, in the words of Pope Francis, that religion itself, the religious dimension, is not a subculture. It is part of the culture of every people, and every nation.”
You can watch the full session at this link.
SR on Religion – 13th Meeting, 37th Regular Session Human Rights Council
The Holy See’s contribution begins at 33:15
Does the pope shit in the woods?
The arrogance is stunning.
This crap was accepted centuries ago before we learned that it was OK to question dogma.
Luther started a war , so did the Protestants….
Give us freedom from these anachronistic bullies……Let their damned gods fight their war.
That is how the religions continue, with the brainwashing of children. If they had to wait until kids were 16 before introducing them to religion, most would not buy into the bullshit.
Wow there it is right there in black and white. You SHALL be compelled to accept this whether you like it or not. They really believe that they are above the law or individual conscience.
It’s hard to see how genuine freedom of religion can exist without freedom from religion. The world does not suffer from a lack of people who would love to be able to force their beliefs on others, and their track record is clear. I would not care to live in a world where the catholic church got to make the rules for everyone.
Why do they put any priest on this committee. His mind is made up. There should be no bias for this topic.